Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to information in many countries. This is a danger to our societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Unrestricted access to information throughout various devices present high likelihood of fake information. Today, many people public unreal data aiming at collecting wider audience ,who find the publisher to be true and believe it,ultimately giving him an opportunity to make good profits by advertising.A case in my point is my country , Uzbekistan, where people are tend to depend on news related to accidents in celebrities’ life, they see in social media. Being provided with wrong content is a main contributor of disagreement between people,even leading to underestimating, in case if person relying on misinformation can not prove his side with facts,eventually leaving people with low reputation.However, if the false data is prevented, appearance of such controversies may decrease,resulting in agreement between community in different fields.So, the preservation of public from fabricated data reduces the debates among public.
Furthermore, nowadays, the demand for IT specialists is increasing day-by-day.Due to this, there are some fake professionals who text to ordinary people lacking of knowledge about digital tools, but with a desire to advertise their businesses by creating sites, making them believed. This is done by giving them certificates stolen from websites that do not hold any connections to these fake specialists. Not only do these wrong ways of gaining humans’ trust affect peoples’ opinion about IT targeting, but also makes people suspicious about any professionals, even those who are the best in their sphere.By contrast, in case community have ability to separate fake and real qualifications,shorter part of society is impacted from such types of hackers.Therefore, public awareness about fake documents should be risen.
To conclude, digital tools have a capacity to provide people with unlimited amount of data with a high potential to turn into threat to community, hence this should be avoided. This is mainly because of arisen risks of intersecting false information.Moreover, availability of data to ordinary people may leads to public confusion either to depend or not on certificates provided by some staffs.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the flow of ideas and the use of linking words. The essay is structured with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which aids in its overall coherence. However, the use of linking words and cohesive devices could be improved to better guide the reader through your arguments. Additionally, the transition between the general discussion of the issue and the specific examples provided could be smoother to enhance the essay’s overall cohesion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of linking words and phrases to ensure smooth transitions between ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea and that all sentences in the paragraph support that idea.

The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. You demonstrate a good command of vocabulary with terms relevant to the topic, such as “fake information,” “digital tools,” and “public awareness.” To further improve, consider varying your language to avoid repetition and ensure precision in your word choice. Additionally, be mindful of the collocations and idiomatic expressions used to ensure they are applied correctly.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. Your essay shows an attempt to use a range of sentence structures, but it is marred by grammatical errors that can hinder clarity. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement, article use, and the correct formation of comparative and superlative forms. Additionally, some sentences are overly complex or awkwardly constructed; simplifying these can improve readability and effectiveness.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. You have clearly addressed the prompt by discussing the dangers of unrestricted access to information and the need to prevent the spread of fake information. Your position is well-defined, and you provide relevant examples to support your arguments. However, the essay could be strengthened by further elaborating on the specific consequences of fake information and the practical steps that can be taken to mitigate these risks. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive in summarizing your main points and reinforcing your stance on the issue.