Most people believe that working in a company for the all year of people’s life is way better than changing the workplace.

Nowadays working in one company till the retiredness is argued by some people. And others opinion, changing the workplace is better, and I think people should work in different companies.
On the one hand, working in one job is the choice, that some people are choosing nowadays for earning more money and they never think about other organizations. Because they afraid of new experience that they should undertake with new work. Therefore, they prefer safe, peaceful and stable life with stable salary. For instance, keeping one job give people feeling of comfortable and nothing to worry about, and that’s why most of the people avoid risk-taking.
On the other hand, working on different organizations also have reasons, that most of the people prefer more. Moving from one company to another one, can be a strategic decision in order to have the variety and gain range of skills and experience. And that can play one of the great role in the future. However it might be a lack of losting job, and day by day most of the people are risking that recruit at diverse set of skills or increase salary, just by changing the organization. For example, some people can really feel boring from job or salary and then they might try to increase by changing the company. In my opinion, working in a different workplace is much more beneficial for people to increase creativity and skills of communication with other employees, not only this but also ability of working in a group.
To Conclude, as I mentioned before, working in the same or different organizations are have both benefits. Personally, I prefer to work with different employees because it gives to human a lot of benefits while working, from skills of communication to skills working in more companies.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the writer’s stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your position.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the majority of sentences are free from grammatical errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect sentence constructions that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the pros and cons of working in the same company versus changing workplaces. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the topic.