Nowadays more tasks at home amd work are being performed by robots. Is it a positive or negative development?

Today more and more responsibilities at home and workplace are carried out by robots. Despite the fact, there are some consequences of this development, I am of the view that it is a change for the better.
True, automation has some negatives. One of them is job displacement. This leads to unemployement as robots can replace human workers, which can cause for economic inequality. Additionally, the high initial investment is required to purchase.
On the other hand, robots have many abilities which can outweight these disadvantages. One of them is increasing efficiency and productivity. Robots can work continously without any breaks, which can lead to faster completion of tasks. Consistency and precision are another benefit. Because, robots perform tasks with high accuracy, and reduce the errors which human can make. Therefore, safety is one of the most important benefits. Robots can perform the requirements, which are dangerous for human. For example, the robot called Atlas, which made by Boston Dynamics. It is used in search and rescue missions in dangerous places, like disaster areas. The benefits of robots do not end there, because ot widely utilized for home tasks. Robot vacuum cleaners like Electrolux Trilobite, for example, can be set up to clean carpets and mop the floors at certain time of the day, and even making no noise while doing so.
To conclude, while automation have several detremental sides, it can reduce the risk of human injury and causes for improved quality of products. Also, they can help people with regular tasks of cleaning and cooking at home.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, there are some issues with coherence, as the connection between ideas can be unclear. More explicit linking words could help to clarify the relationships between different ideas.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure that the use of cohesive devices is consistent and appropriate.

The essay uses a variety of vocabulary, including some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the formality of the language is generally appropriate, but there are a few instances where a more formal tone could be used.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there is a good range of structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the majority of sentences are free from grammatical errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect phrasing that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of punctuation is generally accurate, but there are a few instances where it could be used more effectively to enhance clarity.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant, and the body paragraphs each focus on a single main idea, which is well supported with specific examples. However, the essay could be improved by providing a more detailed exploration of the counter-argument and by offering a more nuanced conclusion that takes into account the complexities of the issue.