Skip to main content

s

In our modern era, opinions differ among people towards taking risks and adding shifts in our lives. While some people think life without changes and doing the same things are better for their liking, others agrue that change is a positive thing and it is okay to take risks. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the debate and share my own perspective.
If we look at it one way, many think that sticking to a familiar routine brigns a sense of stability and security. When life is predictable, it is easier to plan and feel in control. For example, staying in the same job or living in the same town can provide a strong foundation for family and long-term goals. This kind of consistency can reduce stress and help people focus on what truly matters to them. However, the downside is that life can become repetitive, and people might miss out on opportunities to learn and grow.
If we look at it another way, making changes in our daily life brings numerous benefits and sense of adventure. For instance, going to school or work by another road for the first time seems really engaging, making a person feel excited. Some people changes the posions of their furniture twice a year because that makes them feel like they are living in a new house. Furthermore, taking risks is always fun and teaches practical lessons, adding excitement to boring life. Many people even move to different country in order to try new meals, make new friends, experiencing memorable moments of their life.
In conclusion, some people prefer the familiarity of routine, while others see change as an opportunity. Both have their advantages, but I feel that embracing change often leads to a richer, more rewarding life. After all, the best experience come from taking a leap into the unknown.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.

Suggestions
  • Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
  • Make sure to clearly state your position in the conclusion and summarize the main points.

The essay uses a variety of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and precision. Additionally, the use of synonyms could be increased to avoid repetition and enhance the lexical resource.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are few grammatical errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds variety and interest to the writing. However, there are a few instances of incorrect verb forms and subject-verb agreement that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of passive voice could be increased to enhance the grammatical range.

The essay addresses the task and provides a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the benefits of both embracing change and sticking to routine. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the potential drawbacks of embracing change or taking risks.

Suggestions
  • Ensure that the argument is fully developed and supported with relevant examples.