Skip to main content

Scientific research should be primarily funded by governments instead of commercial companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Scientific research has long been associated with innovations that impact every aspect of our lives positively. However, the question of who should fund this research is open to debate, with governments seen as the primary investor rather than commercial entities. Even though this responsibility should be put primarily on the former, cooperation between both in funding the research should be encouraged.
One of the most critical arguments why the government should be the primary investor of scientific research lies in its objective. Government-funded research often focuses on public welfare, aiming at long-term gains although the potential for the immediate benefit is low. This type of research is carried out primarily to address the most pressing issues facing populations such as climate change, public health crises and energy shortages. With the main purpose being the betterment of humans, government agencies are found more responsible for allocating money to research. In addition, governments have a significant amount of resources at their own disposal that come through raising taxpayers’ money. This is another reason why scientific research should be invested by the government as far as it is in favor of the public good, demonstrating a right use of public budget.
That being said, it is essential for governments to cooperate with private sectors in conducting research. For instance, the successful cooperation between NASA, a government sector, and SpaceX, a private company can be a good case in point, with both attempting towards space exploration. Despite their objectives being slightly distinctive, they both are in the way of bringing innovations to society and making positive changes in people’s lives. The same can be said for commercial organizations like manufacturing conglomerates, pharmaceutical companies and technology giants that play different but important roles. Their interference in research may end up with positive results that can help improve different aspects of life. For example, pharmaceuticals directing money into creating drugs and treatments can offer their products at lower cost to the general public, helping those struggling financially take care of their health.
In conclusion, saying that either governments or commercial companies should be more accountable to fund scientific research is not sensible. Instead, encouraging both to work together is critical since their missions are to serve the society in various ways.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
  • Ensure that your paragraphs have a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication.

The essay addresses the task fully and presents a well-developed response. The arguments are well-supported and the conclusion is logical. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments.

Suggestions
  • Try to include more specific examples to support your arguments.