Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each government. Do you agree or disagree?

We are living in a world of unprecedented environmental challenges that need immediate solutions. In this regard, there is a view that global initiatives should come together to solve them rather than a single government. I completely agree with this viewpoint for two reasons.
Global problems such as climate change, pollution and ozone layer depletion require require international cooperation, as all countries, with no exception, face them. These issues are deteriorating over time due in large part to human activities like unnecessary flights and an excessive consumption of resources. If the governments were to encourage sustainability, environmental concerns would be mitigated to a greater extent. For example, switching to environmentally friendly modes of transportation and greener energy sources like solar and wind, along with calling people for being mindful consumers can alleviate environmental issues significantly. These measures would be effective if they were taken on a global scale.
Furthermore, it is also important to consider low-income countries in resolving environmental problems. This is especially true for African nations that struggle to meet the needs of their populations, let alone investing in big projects. In this case, the delegation of responsibility to countries without taking into account their financial situation is not a sensible decision, for they cannot go beyond their individual needs. On top of that, countries share ecosystems with one another. This means even after remedying environmental issues in one country while a bordering one still has them, they continue spreading, stressing the importance of working together towards a shared goal.
In conclusion, global collaboration in resolving environmental problems should be encouraged since the effectiveness would be greater when each country promotes sustainability. In addition, some countries suffer economically, meaning placing the responsibility on them is not feasible and other rich countries therefore should aid, necessitating cooperation in this sense as well.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The use of transition words and phrases helps to guide the reader through the text. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. For example, in the second paragraph, the transition between the general importance of international cooperation and the specific example of low-income countries could be smoother.

Suggestions

Try to use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that the transition between ideas is smooth and logical.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the environment and international cooperation. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. For example, in the first paragraph, the phrase “switching to environmentally friendly modes of transportation and greener energy sources like solar and wind, along with calling people for being mindful consumers” could be rephrased for clarity.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of grammatical structures, with only minor errors. The overall accuracy is high, and the use of complex sentences and structures helps to convey the ideas clearly and effectively. However, there are a few minor errors that could be revised for clarity. For example, in the first paragraph, the phrase “require require international cooperation” is repetitive and could be revised for clarity.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The essay effectively addresses the task, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant, and the body paragraphs are well-structured and focused. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments. For example, in the first paragraph, the example of low-income countries could be more specific to strengthen the argument.