Some countries have legal ages at which people can drink. Other believe not having strict laws is a better policy. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Governmental policies have a differing opinion on the topic of setting a specific legal age reaching which individuals are allowed to consume alcohol. However, numerous countries have already inroduced such limits, while the rest reject considering age limit as a pivotal term.Although, a thrill to intake banned drinks may occure in young generations’ mind, I side with the former approach.
Proponents of latter statement cite various reasons to reinforce their stance. The main one is youngsters’ engagement in trial of prohibited consumption. This is because of human psychology, since when person is asked to prevent himself from something, he goes against it and develop interest to do that . A case in point is Nationwide Prohibition which lasted from 1920 to 1933. Then public went against the rules and the illegel sales of alcohol drinks enhanced sharply by the time. Hence, settlement of regulations against humans’ mentality is not considered to be a good option.
Despite the teenagers’ tendency for trying prohibited action,I would agree if there was a precise age at which they are allowed to drink alcohol. This is because of high risks of addiction.When young people consume alcohol-based drinks, their degree of self-conroll will reduce, thereby resulting in bad behaviour presented by them. Not only do these uncontrollable performances reduce their reputation among society, but present a growth in the rate of crime caused by young society.
Furthermore, ones starting alcohol consumption in early life are likely to come across several health issues as their well-being is priority for whole community. Unlike those becoming dependent to liquor in elder life stage, they harm their medical wellness from early stages because of insufficient endurance to wishes. Failure to resist desires related to beverage liquids put a heart under a pressure, eventually leaving it suspectible to face with heart related issues, heart attack and blood pressure, some of which may end up with fatal consequences.
To conclude, true, human psychology might be a problem to combat with, but I believe that comprehension of its’ negative effects on long-term addiction and further overall medical state might stop them from obtaining bad habits.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to clearly state your opinion in the conclusion and summarize the main points.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and precision.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of complex grammatical structures with a good level of accuracy. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for improved clarity and precision.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay effectively addresses the task, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The writer provides relevant, extended and supported ideas. However, the argument could be further developed and supported with more specific examples.