Some people believe that government should prioritize spending on public transportation instead of building new roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The debate over whether governments should allocate more funds to public transportation or focus on constructing new roads remain contentious.While I truly believe that investigation on improving overall quality of public transportation system would be an ideal solution for varying problems,ranging from pollution to severe traffic congestion.
Investing in public transportation may lead to comprehensive advantages that cannot be neglected.Its assistance in creating a sustainable environment on roads is tremendous since efficient public transit sytems play a significant role to reduce number of private vehicles on big roads,alleviating bumper-to-bumper traffic,being a primary reason that leads to a sense of frustration and anger due to spending an extended time in traffic.Governments should allocate more investment on boosting the quality of transportation system owing to its help in minimazing greenhouse gas emission.For example,cities with well-developed metro systems ,like Tokyo and London experience smoother flow of traffic and less air pollution as opposed to cities with unstructured transport systems,creating severe complications in terms of quality of air and amount of traffic in center areas of cities.Another worth mentioning point is that public transport is cost-effective for residents,promoting equitable access to mobility for people from different socio-economic backgrounds.
On the other hand,building new roads is often seen as a temporary solution to traffic congestion.Expanding road networks not only encourage people to buy additional cars but also it would be a key driver of manufacturing more and more cars,resulting in environment degradation,including deforestation and habitat destruction which put not only human being but also wildlife in a difficult situation.Additionally,road constuction is costly and takes large amount of time instead governments should enhance public transportation system,being a more efficient use of available recourses without harming the valubale environment.
In conclusion,although investing in expansion of new roads would create an attractive image of a certain area,but it comes with trade-off which harmes the environment and motivate companies and people to purchase more vehicles,resulting in severe traffic congestion.The prime choice would be focusing on imrovement of transportation system.
The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Make sure that your arguments are presented in a clear and logical order.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of language with a variety of vocabulary, but there are some instances of awkward phrasing and incorrect word choices. For example, “investigation on improving” should be “investment in improving,” and “minimizing greenhouse gas emission” should be “minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.” Refining word choices and phrasing will help improve clarity and professionalism. Additionally, ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains a few grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. These include issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. For example, “investigation on improving” should be “investment in improving,” and “minimizing greenhouse gas emission” should be “minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.” Paying closer attention to grammar and punctuation, and ensuring subject-verb agreement will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing the benefits of investing in public transportation and the drawbacks of building new roads. The writer presents a clear stance, advocating for the improvement of public transportation rather than the construction of new roads. The essay provides relevant examples to support the arguments, but the discussion could be more fully developed with a more detailed exploration of counterarguments. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the writer’s stance.
Suggestions
- Make sure to fully develop your arguments and support them with specific examples and evidence.