Some people believe that healthcare should be free for everyone, while others argue that individuals should pay for their own healthcare. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The debate surrounding whether healthcare should be free for public or people should take responsibility for their medical needs remains contentious. While some advocate for healthcare should be free as human right others claim that individual should fund their own medical needs.
Proponents of free medical treatment believe that no individual should suffer or die due to a lack of financial means this mean that all expenses related to health issues ought to be covered by government. In countries like Canada and UK have legislated law associated with free health which their demographics can receive free medical support. Even low- income families can gain free support to their health problems in these countries
Conversely, those who oppose free healthcare argue that each individual should take responsibility for their health issues. This can reduce long waiting times, denies even bustling hospitals but it significantly improve high quality medicines and advanced technologies because governments can invest advancement technologies with the combination of funding by patients.
In my opinion, although financial treatment has merit in personal accountability and it can make room individuals to the utilize of professional devices, benefits of free healthcare far outweight these concepts. All people regardless of financial status can receive medical care further they never denied. Therefore all countries the world over, should initiate free healthcare systems as Canada and UK.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and restating the opinion.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to restate your opinion and summarize the key points in the conclusion.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies. The essay attempts to use a variety of complex grammatical structures, but there are some errors in sentence construction and tense usage that can be distracting. Additionally, there are some issues with pronoun reference and article use that can affect the overall clarity of the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing both views on the issue of free healthcare and providing the writer’s opinion. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay would benefit from more specific examples to support the points made.
Suggestions
- Include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph has a clear focus and is well-developed.