Some people believe that in a city the best way to travel is by car, while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of traveling in a city. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The question of whether traveling by some vehicles has long been a topic of debate, with some contending that traveling by car is the best way in a city, while opponents argue that the best way to travel in a city is by bikes. I, personally, advocate for the latter as it causes less environmental impact while cars lead to pollution.
To begin with, proponents of taking a trip by car argue that it makes people prone to choose more places to visit. When people know traveling by car is a bit difficult and hard, It may have some options to tour more places. For example, if I have spare time or fit in my family or my friends to bond with, I have some opportunities to go to some places to take a picnic or to go for a walk. Consequently, this could lead to some entertainment and to spend time with relatives successfully.
On the other hand, critics of this viewpoint claim that bicycles are the best way of traveling in a city. They believe that taking a trip by bikes reduces traffic congestion in urban areas, and it leads to less environmental impact. Also, we can go sightseeing places like eco parks and amateur parks. For instance, while traveling by bicycle, we can see everywhere we pass through.
In my opinion, cycles are a better way to travel in a city. I believe this because while traveling by cars, some problems appear and transports can cause pollution on account of smokes which they produce. So, touring by bikes is environmentally beneficial to nature, and it can affect a healthier lifestyle.
In conclusion, while some argue that a better way of traveling in a city is by car, others believe that taking a trip by cycles is the best way to travel in an urban area. I firmly support the latter viewpoint because it is more beneficial for the environment and helps to reduce traffic jams and congestion.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive. Clearer topic sentences and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transitions between ideas.
Make sure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that all sentences in the paragraph relate to this topic.

The essay uses a range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, but there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. For example, “It may have some options to tour more places” could be rephrased as “It may provide the opportunity to tour more places.” Improving lexical precision and variety will enhance the clarity and professionalism of the essay. Additionally, ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve overall readability.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there is a good range of structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. These include issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. For example, “While traveling by cars, some problems appear and transports can cause pollution on account of smokes which they produce” should be “While traveling by car, some problems arise, and transportation can cause pollution through the smoke they produce.” Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, including correct verb forms and preposition usage, will improve the overall quality of the essay.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the benefits of traveling by car and by bike in a city, and it clearly states the writer’s preference for bike travel. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and by offering a more detailed explanation of the benefits of bike travel. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive. Providing more specific examples and a more detailed explanation of the benefits of bike travel will strengthen the essay. Ensuring that the conclusion fully summarizes the main points discussed will also improve the overall quality of the essay.