Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There is a view about whether skilled professionals should contribute to their country that trained them or they should be a free and able to choose wherever they work has been a topic of debate for many years. This essay will discuss both perspectives and then will be presented my viewpoint.
On the one hand, requiring professionals to work in their training country has several merits. Firstly, the government often spend a huge amount of money to teach professionals in medicine or engineering fields, that’s why, these people should work their hometown for justifying their duty behind the government. Secondly, defecting skilled doctors and engineers in some countries leads to some problems due to a lack experts, therefore, if they stay their trained country, they will able to tackle those issues seeing as they can help to develop the fields of medicine and infrastructure. Finally, individuals who assist to change their hometown leads to overall development of a country as these movements reflect their loyalty to there.
On the other hand, according to others opinion, individuals should be to choose their preferred areas of work. The basic reason would be their intensions towards better salaries, advanced technologies and improved working conditions abroad, which are unavailable in their own cities. For instance, a doctor or an engineer from a low income country actually want to move to developed countries where they can enhance their skills and achieve more personal and professional growth and find better research opportunities. Additionally, with such attempts their own country may gain a well-fare if professionals return later with advanced technologies and expertise.
In my opinion, a balance approch is significant. For example, professionals must only go abroad to learn a wide-range of knowledges and experiences about their promotion and then return their hometown to use. Therefore, en equal measure, governments should offer higher bills, better industries them to work hard and do not leave a country. Ultimately, this approach ensures that individuals bring a profit to their trained country without any restrictions.
In conclusion, professionals like doctors and engineers may go abroad both study and work as long as coming back home.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and clearly stating the overall stance.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the key points and clearly state your overall stance.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds some variety and interest to the text. However, there are several grammatical errors and some issues with punctuation and spelling that can make the text difficult to understand. These errors need to be addressed to improve the overall clarity and readability of the essay.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing both sides of the argument and providing a clear personal stance. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay would benefit from more specific examples to support the points made.