Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people argue that professionals like doctors and engineers should be demanded to work in their native land, while others believe that they should be free to work in another country if they wish. From a personal perspective, the second opinion could be better, because of the independence of choice.
There are two main reasons, why this type of jobs should work in the motherland. First of all, there is a shortage of these positions in many countries, which effect on state’s status and economic disparity. These issues could face the regions, a different type of affects like starvation or poorness. Another problem is the loss of patriotism, which is a big problem for the future of republic or monarchy. Government could lose their loyal army and other type of occupations.
Despite of the arguments mentioned above, people should have choice of the territory of employment. Firstly, the main reason to move abroad for occupation, is the conditions of working life and salary. As an example, Uzbekistan, a lot of students who graduated medicine or engineering universities are going to earn a small amount of many, while the students who prefer USA as a work position earn triple more than their employers in the motherland. Another cause is the interest of others nation’s life. There is a type of people who like to travel and it could a reason for moving.
In conclusion, even though people have to work in their Homeland, I prefer the freedom of choice of the worker.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your ideas in each paragraph.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise language could help to strengthen the essay.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are few grammatical errors. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage, as well as some issues with sentence structure. The essay uses a variety of complex grammatical structures, and the majority of sentences are well-structured and grammatically correct. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied sentence structures could help to strengthen the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic and presents a clear position, but the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay could benefit from a more thorough exploration of the implications of both perspectives, as well as a more detailed explanation of the writer’s opinion. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the key points and clearly restating the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Ensure that your argument is fully developed and supported with specific examples.
- Consider addressing potential counterarguments to strengthen your position.