Some people believe that public transport should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Public transport should be without charge for all individuals, as believed by certain citizens. This essay will explore both sides of the argument, considering the potential advances and disadvantages of free public transportation.
The main point is that of making free public transportation by governments. This is because in today’s modern life, many technologies are increased rather than in the past, such as bus, car, and others.
For example, modern electric bus, like the Byd electric bus, it is extremely convenient for people. Not only does it run on electricity, but it is also equipped with GPS, and it helps reduce air pollution and improve urban transport.
Besides that, all individuals do not fear paying their tickets for public transport, because it is free and affordable, plus you can move easily to other places, and you feel confidently in public transport, which are highly beneficial, and it is important for earth population.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks for government and people, because if the government made public transport free, it could face a financial crisis, and car manufacturing companies would have to halt their operations. It may hinder step of countries, even people may fight with each other. For instance, free transport may result in overcrowding, which can reduce the quality of service, causing delays, discomforts, and overall dissatisfaction for passengers.
In my view, this is especially beneficial for poor families, and really they do not have money to pay ticket price, also it supports reduce traffic.
To sum up, I firmly believe that public transport should be free for everyone, because it helps move easily to other places, as well as people do not have money to pay and advantageous outweigh disadvantages.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to link all the ideas in a paragraph to the main point of the paragraph.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and punctuation mistakes that can affect the overall clarity. Additionally, the use of articles and prepositions is sometimes inaccurate. The essay would benefit from a thorough review and revision to correct these errors.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the pros and cons of making public transport free for everyone. The writer presents a clear position, supporting the idea with arguments and examples. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and by offering a more detailed analysis of the topic. The conclusion is also somewhat brief and could be more fully developed.