Some people argue that the government should allocate more funds to the creation of public art, such as sculptures and paintings in cities to improve their livability. Nevertheless, I believe that the government should prioritize other areas to enhance the overall quality of life for residents.
On the one hand, the addition of art in public spaces can significantly make a city more appealing. For example, statues and paintings can transform dull, empty spaces into vibrant areas that people enjoy visiting. For example, cities such as Berlin and Melbourne are well-known for their extensive street art, which not only contributes to a spectacular view but also attracts tourists and stimulates local economy. Moreover, art plays important role on people’s well-being by adding beauty to their surroundings and fostering creativity.
On the other hand, while art undoubtedly enhances the environment, it should not be the government’s primary focus when it comes to spending. There are other critical areas that require urgent attention, such as transportation infrastructure and affordable housing. In many cities, public transport systems are overcrowded and inefficient, and there is a pressing need for better housing options for low-income residents. These fundamental issues have a direct impact on the daily lives of citizens and should be prioritized to ensure a higher standard of living.
In conclusion, although public art undeniably enhances the visual appeal of a city and attracts more visitors, it should not be the primary focus of government spending. Investing in infrastructure, healthcare, and housing is more important for creating a high quality of life for residents.