Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Others believe it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In an era characterized by divisive issues and polarized opinions, people are divided as to whether we should have friends who share the same views as us or if a friendship should involve occasional disagreements. While agreements in friendship help maintain it harmonious, disagreements foster mutual growth. I personally favor a friendship where everything is transparent.
It is true that a friendship tends to last longer when there are no misunderstandings and conflicts between friends. These situations often happen when one does not agree with what their friend is doing. For example, a student choosing a certain major at university amid disagreements with their parents needs support in the form of belief, which can come from their friends. In such a dilemma, the existence of the friend siding with their decision can strengthen the relationship, as they would not feel isolated any more.
Nevertheless, i do not consider a friendship healthy when a truth is hidden just to give a temporary relief to a friend, for it can hinder personal growth. To be specific, it is the best course of action to tell straight when an individual is going in the wrong direction in both personal and professional realms. This is to remind that they should change and make a difference in their life, even when that change seems daunting. This, in turn, leaves a room for improvement after realizing one’s mistakes. For instance, a person who suffers from obesity should be given advice by a friend to make a healthy shift in their lifestyle by taking up sports and having a balanced diet. Although it might make them upset at the beginning, the long-term result would prove such a friendship essential.
In conclusion, agreements in friendship can be helpful in maintaining it strong; however, it is more imperative to oppose whenever needed, since doing so lets a person know where to work on more, affecting their growth positively.

7.5

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. Transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother to enhance the overall flow of the essay. Some ideas are introduced abruptly without sufficient explanation or linking back to the main argument, which can disrupt the coherence.

Suggestions

Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
Ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. Some words and phrases are used awkwardly or incorrectly, affecting the clarity and precision of the writing. For example, “agreements in friendship” should be “harmonious agreements,” and “a truth hidden just to give a temporary relief” could be rephrased for clarity.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. There are several grammatical errors that need to be addressed, such as missing articles, incorrect verb forms, and punctuation errors. For example, “agreements in friendship help maintain it harmonious” should be “agreements in friendship help maintain harmony,” and “i do not consider a friendship healthy” should be “I do not consider a friendship healthy.”

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both perspectives on the issue and providing a clear personal stance. However, the argument could be further developed in places to provide more depth and insight. The essay could benefit from more specific examples to support the arguments made. While the essay provides personal examples, they could be more varied and detailed to enhance the argument.