Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is an ongoing debate over the importance of studying food science and learning to prepare meals. While Some argue that it is essential that students learn it, I side with those who believe that there are more important subjects for students to study.
On the one hand, studying food science could be beneficial for students. The first benefit is the chance for students to familiarize themselves with food content. It is especially essential for those who are allergic to certain ingredients. If students learn and get a deep understanding of reading food labels, they may avoid eating meals with ingredients which cause allergies, thus preventing any potential health hazards. For example, recently one of my friends was hospitalized because of eating salad containing peanuts, to which my friend was allergic. Additionally, there is a financial benefit behind learning to prepare meals. If people know how to cook, they may save a lot on food by preparing dishes at home rather than eat at restaurants or cafes.
On the other hand, others including I believe that studying food science and learning to cook it is not as important as other subjects for students. Firstly, most people get the first lesson about food and cooking at home from their parents. Parents teach their children everything they need to prepare a meal ranging from the ingredients they need to cook a meal to potential dangers they should look out for while cooking. It is believed that these practical lessons are good enough for students to know about food and its science, leaving no need to study it as a form of lesson at school at university. Moreover, there are far more essential subject to study for students apart from food science, mathematics, physics, biology and chemistry, to name a few. These subjects are so universal and vital that no matter what career path students may want to pursue in the future, they need an understanding of at least two of them in order to good at their job and enhance their career prospective.
In conclusion, while studying the science of food could be useful, equipping students with a survival skill, I believe that it is not as important for students to have in their curriculum as other subjects that align with their future job.

7.0

The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use more linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central topic.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more specific examples could enhance the argument.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and is generally grammatically accurate. However, there are a few minor errors that could be corrected for clarity. Additionally, the use of more complex grammatical structures could enhance the argument.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing both views and providing the writer’s opinion. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with more specific examples. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive.