Skip to main content

Some people think technology development decreases crime, while others believe thatit actuallyencourages crime

Some people think that technology development decreases crime, others believe it really motivates crime.
Nowadays, technology is more important role our lives. Some people is reduced the crime but others think that increase crime. Both ideas have reasons.
On the one hand, technology very useful for reduce the crime. For example, security cameras recorded everything and that helps for police to catch the criminals. Mobile phones are beneficial because people had dangerous accident, they can call for help. Technology helps to save the information about criminals, so after that easy to find them.
On the other hand, technology can also increase crime. For example, phreaker use computers, they can steal money from banks or people. They stolen credit cards also personal information and they might worked illegal. Another one problem social medias because some criminals use it for to plan bad things.
In my opinion, technology is harmful, but it had more profit. It has some problems but it can safe and easy to our live. We only use technology directly. We must to control it.
In conclusion, technology has both good and bad site. It might be reduce the crime but it creates new problems. How we use technology will decide if it helps or harms.
Eshmuminova Gulsevar

5.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a basic structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes awkward or incorrect, affecting the overall coherence. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and providing a clear final thought.

Suggestions
  • Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
  • Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and provide a clear final thought.

The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with some attempts to use less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices, which can affect the overall clarity and effectiveness of the writing. Additionally, the use of synonyms could be improved to avoid repetition and enhance the lexical resource.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which helps to demonstrate a good range of grammar. However, there are some errors in verb tense, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure, which can affect the overall clarity and coherence of the writing. Proofreading is recommended to correct these errors and improve the overall quality of the writing.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of technology in relation to crime. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the examples provided could be more specific and relevant to the topic. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and providing a clear final thought.

Suggestions
  • Ensure that your argument is fully developed and supported with specific examples.
  • Make sure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and provides a clear final thought.