Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that some historic buildings are more valuable to preserve than others. I agree with this option for this statement.
Preserving buildings with historical and cultural importance is essential because they serve as substantial links to the past. I think monuments, palaces, and religious sites often represent significant events. Every place and monument has significant figures or cultural milestones. So that’s why it is important for people and every country. So, these ancient and memorable things and places are unique for museums. For example, structures like the Taj Mahal or the Kuolo Lampur attract millions of tourists and symbolize a nations identity. Because all ancient buildings have very old and unique things a few years ago, people need to be appreciated and safe. Moreover, scientists may discover varieties of minds and things from these ancient buildings. And they may give different kind of details for history.
However, it is only famous or monumental buildings that deserve preservation. Old buildings fall quickly and break down and also can cause people to be dead. In addition, when natural disasters occur, the old buildings drop quickly. As a result, the governments pay more attention to losing the ancient buildings. Because, during the dropping, it cause a dead thousands of people. And more people believe any rumors. If the government destroys the ancient buildings. As a consequence, reduce tourists arrival. And the foreign benefits to the country will slow down. On the other hand, destroying ancient buildings is harmful. And people suffering from homelessness.
In conclusion, if the ancient buildings become old mosques. But I prefer to build new buildings instead of ancient buildings.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s position.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to link all the supporting points back to the main argument to ensure full cohesion.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic. However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise language could help to strengthen the essay.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar, but they do not impede communication. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which helps to maintain reader interest. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in the use of verb tenses, pronouns, and prepositions that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of more complex grammatical structures could help to strengthen the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the importance of preserving certain historic buildings over others. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could provide more specific examples to support its points. Additionally, the conclusion could more clearly restate the writer’s position and summarize the main points discussed.
Suggestions
- Provide more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea and is well supported by the rest of the essay.