Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Only particular historical buildings are considered necessary to preserve . I believe that all buildings should be assessed if they are worth to conserve for the cultural and historical heritage.
Old architecture makes history and culture. Mosques, castles, gardens, mansions and parks may be special for different reasons. For instance, a castle may be valued because of the family who lived in there, the design of the building or because of the art masterpieces inside ; a mosque may be worth preserving because the person that built it or a person that is buried there. Aesthetic is another reason to consider, due to human nature of seeking beauty in things, and this beauty can be found in the past. For people, beauty is something that fills them with certain feelings; feelings can vary from person to person. For instance, a church inside may give someone a feeling of connection or freedom, while someone else finds it’s architecture breathtaking as a masterpiece on the outside.
In contrast, some buildings are not considered to be preserved. That may be because people have reasons to destroy it. For example, some old houses may be demolished because they do not match the safety standards or are not considered well-designed by some people, it also may be because the land where an old building is located will be used for another constructure.
In conclusion, old buildings mean something to humans, that is why they are valued enough to be preserved; buildings may carry historical meaning, cultural heritage or aesthetics of the past. Nevertheless, people do not find a special reason for preservation in other buildings, or people have reasons to remove some buildings.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transitions between ideas.
- Make sure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that all sentences in the paragraph relate to this topic.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. For example, “a mosque may be worth preserving because the person that built it or a person that is buried there” is awkward and could be rephrased for clarity. Improving word choice and using more precise language will enhance the clarity and professionalism of the essay. Additionally, ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve overall readability.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures. However, there are some grammatical errors and awkward constructions that hinder understanding. The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. These include issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. For example, “Old architecture makes history and culture” could be rephrased for clarity, and “it also may be because the land where an old building is located will be used for another constructure” contains a typo (“constructure” should be “construction”). Paying closer attention to grammar and punctuation, and ensuring sentence structures are clear and concise, will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the reasons some old buildings are worth preserving while also acknowledging why some may not be. The writer presents a clear thesis in the introduction and supports it with relevant examples. However, the essay could benefit from a more focused introduction and conclusion that directly address the prompt. Additionally, the writer could provide more specific examples to support their points. The essay could benefit from a more formal tone and style to better fit the task’s requirements.
Suggestions
- Ensure that you fully develop your arguments and support them with relevant examples.
- Consider addressing potential counterarguments to make your position more persuasive.