Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The worth of ancient structures is being questioned, with some believing that the value of certain old buildings is higher than others, which is why not all of them should be preserved. I disagree with this statement because of economic benefits, educational purposes and architectural value.
Some argue that conservation programs of all ancient structures might be an unnecessary expenditure. In their view, in order to maintain old buildings in a good condition, an excessive amount of funding should be channeled into employing specialists who carry out renovations on a regular basis. Besides, hiring employees is not the only cost associated with this process, as there is a need to purchase construction materials such as bricks, stones and wood. These finances can instead be spent on constructing new buildings with beneficial functions, like offices or apartment blocks, which can serve people’s daily needs.
Despite this, I would argue for the protection of all ancient structures for several reasons. First off, historical buildings can act as a catalyst for economic growth. This is mainly because when people travel to other parts of the world, they are drawn to seeing structures that portray historical features of a country, thereby increasing the flow of tourists. A case in point is my city, Samarkand, which has a street filled with old small houses that has become a tourist attraction. As a result of the influx of visitors, the businesses nearby benefit from increased sales, since they tend to use services and purchase products from local shops. Secondly, another function of old buildings is to teach, meaning if schools organize trips to ancient sites that depict historical accounts, they can provide students with immersive learning experience. Last but not least, old buildings allow individuals to learn architectural patterns of the past, making them an invaluable part of human history.
To conclude, although some people might oppose to the idea of preserving all old buildings and suggest that certain structures are more worth saving than others, I remain convinced that these structures are precious in terms of architecture, education and tourism.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion are clearly structured. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. A variety of vocabulary and idiomatic expressions are used appropriately. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. The majority of sentences are error-free. However, there are a few minor errors that could be addressed.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The writer’s opinion is supported with relevant, extended and well-explained ideas. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments.
Suggestions
- Try to include a wider range of specific examples to support your arguments. This will make your writing more persuasive and help to provide a clearer illustration of your points.