Exams are a common way to test students’ knowledge, but some people think they are unfair. They believe exams only test how well students can perform in a short time, not their overall ability. Instead, they suggest using continuous assessment, which evaluates students over a longer period. In this essay, I will justify why continuous assessment is a better way to measure students’ abilities.
Exams can be very stressful for students. Many students feel nervous and cannot perform well, even if they understand the subject. Exams usually focus on memorizing information, which might not show how much a student has truly learned. Also, students who are good at practical or creative work may struggle because exams often do not test these skills.
Continuous assessment is fairer because it looks at a student’s progress over time. This method includes activities like homework, projects, and presentations, which test different skills. Students can also learn from regular feedback and improve. For instance, if a student makes mistakes in an assignment, they can correct them and do better next time. Continuous assessment also helps students prepare for the real world, where effort and teamwork are significant.
In conclusion, exams can be unfair because they test students in a short time and do not measure all their skills. Continuous assessment is a better option because it helps students improve and shows their true abilities. Schools should focus more on continuous assessment to support students’ learning and success.