Some people think that exams are unfair way to measure students ability and they should be replaced with continuous assesment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that continuous assesments are better way to measure student’s knowledge rather than stressfull exams. I totaly agree with this claim since regular assesments are much effective and exams cause some problems like mental illnesses.
It is true that exam sessions are more stressful than we thought. This leads a negative impact on student’s mental health. During exam period, student can feel depression or hurt themselves such as overreading the books in short period. In addition, they do not show real ability due to fearing fail. This can be cause why students need more frequent assesments rather than exam.
Another point is that regular assessments are more effective than exams. If students are taken exams regularly, this would encourage them to study more. Also, when students do an exam in every month, they do not have extra pressure in general. Because frequent assesments make students hard working, only exams give a chance to procrastinate to study later. That means exams will be once in a 6 months that’s way student feel stress. If they fail the exam, they would not have the opportunity to repass.
In conclusion, I believe that exams are unsuitable to test student’s knowledge and they should be replaced by continious evaluations for some reasons I suggest above.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of vocabulary, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of synonyms could be increased to avoid repetition and enhance the overall quality of the writing.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are only minor errors. The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures and there are only minor grammatical errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward phrasing and incorrect verb forms that could be revised for clarity and accuracy. Additionally, the use of punctuation could be improved to enhance the overall readability of the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay clearly addresses the prompt by discussing the disadvantages of exams and the advantages of continuous assessments. The writer presents a clear position and supports it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be more fully developed, and the essay could benefit from a more formal tone and style. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance.
Suggestions
- Include more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that outlines the main point to be discussed.
- Ensure that the essay is written in a formal tone and style.