Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, We need to find a way to live with it. Do you agree or disagree
Some people consider that trying to live with climate change is a better way than observing ways to avoid it completely. Personally, I agree that it’s better to fight for a good life than adapting to that.
There are some ways to mitigate that serious problem. Firstly, public need to be aware of climate change consequences and what actions are causing to improve climate change. There are also people who don’t know the word climate change, let’s not say, its effects. Secondly, much serious policies need to be exposed for people who are damaging environment by many ways, one of them is just to throw away their rubbish to a random place. Finally, people need to seek for alternative ways of energy sources. The ones that doesn’t threat the environment. For example, changing fuel-based cars to electronic ones would be a big trigger to prevent from natural disasters.
Even if we will try to adapt climate change, I don’t think that we will succeed as I’m not an optimistic about an idea that people can find a way to stop big natural disasters like sunamis, thunders, or hurricanes. Furthermore, science predicts that in 2050, some countries will be under the water if we won’t handle that problem. That means that people have to live in density which emerges a lot of viruses like COVID-19. Finally, climate change kills the world of flora, leaving no nutrition for people to keep alive, as plants are not used to have different weather conditions in every day.
In conclusion, there are some people who believe that it’s better to live with climate change instead of observing for solutions to overcome that problem. I’m completely agree with the idea that we need to prevent from climate change, not trying to adapt it.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance on the issue.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the environment and climate change. However, there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and there are only minor errors in grammar and punctuation. However, there are some errors in article and preposition usage, which can affect the overall clarity of the essay. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and shows a good command of grammar and punctuation. However, there are some minor errors that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay clearly addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the issue and providing a personal opinion. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with more specific examples. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.
Suggestions
- Ensure that the argument is fully developed and supported with specific examples.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance on the issue.