Among many pressing issues worldwide, climate change stands out as the most concerning one. In this regard, it is suggested by some that we should stop trying to prevent climate change by working out a way to coexist with it. I completely disagree with this proposal, as forgoing this problem brings significant negative consequences.
There are several measures that can be taken by individuals and the government to mitigate climate change. On an individual level, we should be mindful of our carbon footprint by leading a sustainable lifestyle. This can be done through utilizing resources, such as water and fossil fuels wisely while making only necessary flights or trips by cars. If every individual incorporated sustainable practices into their daily lives, the dangers posed by them to the environment could be reduced significantly.
Regarding the role of the government, it can create green energy sources like wind and solar. Unlike fossil fuels, they do not release greenhouse gas into the atmosphere much, leading to reduction in air pollution. On top of that, the government can also put awareness rising campaigns in place, which is aimed at reducing consumerism which is also posing threats to the environment. As climate change is driven partly by human activities, these combined efforts could make a noticeable difference if achieved successfully.
Saying ‘finding a way to live with it’ is flawed for several reasons. For one, it is, on the one hand, to let us continue posing harms to the natural environment. This is because trying to live with climate change does not necessitate figuring out solutions to lessen its adverse effects, but just carrying on what we are doing for a living. While no significant damage could be seen in the near future, the long-term implications of this decision would be enormous. For example, if people are not prevented from cutting down trees, this can lead to the disappearance of many forests, resulting in ecological imbalance. This, in turn, serves as a breeding ground for environmental issues that further drive climate change. Furthermore, any practical preparations might not be enough to prevent natural disasters like flooding which can be caused by climate change. When it occurs, many people might suffer and be left homeless. These cases can explain that leaving climate change as it is now does more harm than good.
In conclusion, I do not support the view that we should focus on adapting to climate change instead of attempting to resolve it, for doing so brings about serious consequences. Therefore, combating climate change is important to secure a safer future.