Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Will the benefits of this outweigh the problems associated with it?
There is a view that a new language should be invented for communication on a worldwide scale. While this idea may seem beneficial in terms of making it easier for people to interact, I believe English and a few other languages already became too unified into our lives, especially in the business and technology. Thus, there is no need for a new language.
A new global language could be helpful if it combined various elements of different languages into one language, it could be easier to learn and use. For example, many years ago, some group of people tried to invent new language. This group’s leader was Ludwig Zamehof, and in 1887 he was invented Esperanto language. However, Espetanto language couldn’t became global scale language. As a result, people’s interest in that language continued to decline. At the present, approximately only 100.000 people using this language.
Knowing English and a few other languages, such as French and Spanish, has been beneficial for many years. This is because many students try to enter prestigious universities, such as Harvard, Princeton, and others, which are located in the USA, England, and other countries with highly regarded universities. As a result, they have to learn these languages. Not only do they need to learn these languages to enter the university, but also, currently, approximately 80 percent of the world’s information is in English, according to Facebook’s official website. This statistic means that if a person knows English well, they can access about 80 percent of the world’s information.
In conclusion, introducing a new language is unnecessary since English and several other widely spoken languages are already serving their purpose effectively. Encouraging the adoption of a new language would simply lead to the inefficient use of time and resources.
The essay is logically organized and the ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Make sure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points of your essay.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. For example, in the sentence “This group’s leader was Ludwig Zamehof, and in 1887 he was invented Esperanto language.”, the word “invented” should be used instead of “was invented”. In the sentence “Knowing English and a few other languages, such as French and Spanish, has been beneficial for many years.”, the phrase “for many years” is a bit awkward and could be omitted for clarity. Ensuring accurate word choice and using more formal language throughout the essay will improve clarity and readability.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains a few grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. For example, in the sentence “This group’s leader was Ludwig Zamehof, and in 1887 he was invented Esperanto language.”, the verb “invented” is incorrect and should be “invented”. In the sentence “At the present, approximately only 100.000 people using this language.”, the verb “using” should be “are using”. In the sentence “Knowing English and a few other languages, such as French and Spanish, has been beneficial for many years.”, the verb “has been” is incorrect and should be “have been”. Ensuring grammatical accuracy and using a wider range of sentence structures will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the potential benefits and drawbacks of inventing a new global language. The writer takes a clear position that the benefits of not inventing a new language outweigh the drawbacks and provides reasons and examples to support this view. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and evidence to support the arguments made. Additionally, the conclusion could be more comprehensive by summarizing the main points discussed in the essay.
Suggestions
- Try to develop your arguments more fully and provide specific examples to support your points.
- Ensure that your conclusion effectively summarizes the main points of your essay.