Skip to main content

Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Will the benefits of this outweigh the problems associated with it?

Some people argue that inventing a new international language is needed for a better global communication. While having a shared language globally offers a number of upsides, I firmly believe this would cause several significant issues.
One advantage of inventing an international language is enhanced global communication. A universal language would eliminate language barriers, allowing people from different linguistic backgrounds to communicate more easily. This, in turn, could improve international relations, business, diplomacy, and education. Another upside of a shared language is its possible economic advantages. Through an international language, global businesses and economies could benefit from smoother communication across borders. As a result, there will potentially be reduced misunderstandings, improved trade, and increased efficiency in international operations.
Despite these advantages of introducing an international language, it may lead to some serious issues. One of the main problems associated with a universal language is the possible loss of cultural identity. As language is a significant part of a person’s cultural identity, a global language could diminish the importance of native languages. Consequently, this may potentially lead to the loss of cultural diversity and linguistic heritage. For instance, In Middle Ages, especially during the colonization period, dominant nations such English and Spanish got the native population of their colonies to learn their languages, causing to the loss of some indigenous languages and cultures in North and South Americas.
Additionally, already existing international languages, particularly English, are another downside. English is already widely used as a global language in many fields of the modern life. That’s why some may argue that rather than inventing a new language, resources should be directed towards improving the education and accessibility of English. The main argument here is that introducing a new language globally would be a massive logistical challenge since getting billions of people to learn and use it would require an enormous amount of time, resources, and global cooperation. Besides, people may resist learning a new language, especially if they feel attached to their native language.
In conclusion, although the invention of a new neutral language may deliver some benefits such as improved global communication and economic advantages, the potential problems like loss of cultural identity that would stem from it are much more serious. Instead, fostering the use already widely-spoken languages, especially English, would save a great amount of time, resources and effort.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
  • Ensure that your examples are directly relevant to the point you are making.

The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect sentence construction.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. However, the introduction could be more engaging and the conclusion could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions
  • Consider revising the introduction to make it more engaging and to provide a clearer thesis statement.
  • Consider revising the conclusion to make it more comprehensive and to provide a clearer summary of the main points.