some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. will the benefits of this outweigh the problems associated with it?
There is a view that some people think that we need to invent a new language for international communication, while others think that there are more drawbacks than benefits, and I personally agree with this idea.
On the one hand, this form of invention entails a number of benefits, allowing many people to maintain the relationship and teamwork. Firstly, people can understand each other better or find like-minded people to communicate and share ideas with. For example, at present most people are running a business with foreign countries, and they usually use translation to communicate, and inventing a new language for international communication can be very useful, reducing misunderstandings. Secondly, it would be neutral. A new language would not belong to any specific country or culture, reducing favoritism and dominance, such as the current global reliance on English.
On the other hand, I, however, think that the prevention of crime is being improved for many years, and I am of the thought that it is enough. The primary reason is the disappearance of cultural value, because language is one of the most essential parts of a culture. Many countries, their popularity values the own language, and they will easily ignore the new invention. Along with this, it will be hard to teach the new language, especially in poor nations. Some poor countries have not got the resources or money to teach or advertise it.
In conclusion, creating a new language for international communication, indeed, confers several benefits to the people, adding to its popularity. Regardless, I am more drawn to the practical downsides of the reverse of this mode, like it will destroy the culture and value of language & make it hard for poor countries, and to teach it will cost lots of money.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the overall stance.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and clearly state your overall stance.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in the use of prepositions and articles. The essay uses a variety of complex grammatical structures with some errors. There are a few grammatical inaccuracies and errors in the use of prepositions and articles that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay effectively addresses the task, presenting a clear position and supporting it with relevant examples. However, the argument could be further developed to provide a more thorough and nuanced analysis of the issue.
Suggestions
- Ensure that you fully develop your argument and provide a thorough analysis of the issue.
- Consider addressing potential counterarguments to provide a more balanced and comprehensive analysis of the issue.