Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Will these benefits of this outweigh the problems associated with it?
In the present age, there is a proposal that there is a growing demand to create a new universal language for communicating globally. While the drawbacks associated with this trend can entail certain issues such as the loss of national identity and the emergence of public misunderstandings, I wholeheartedly believe that the benefits—the development of trade, a sense of unity, and a chance to globalization—seem to be more sensible in their ways.
To commence with, there are some undoubted demerits to make an invention of global interaction language, one of which is related to the cultural heritage of the country. To illustrate, if all nations have a single language for communication, they might begin to lose their national identity. Another factor to consider is that creation of a new communication medium poses a risk to public peace and harmony. Since this phenomenon is more likely to be rejected by society, if accepted, public shows their disagreement towards this tendency, making citizens dissatisfied resulting in civil riots. In addition to this, learning a new language requires considerable more time which tends to be disagreed by ordinary people.
These disadvantages notwithstanding, there are more compelling arguments in favor of the introduction of a new language. The chief primary upside is to boost trade and commerce among countries. This is mainly because countries can broaden their import and export pie using the universal language, enabling them to boost their own economy. This, in turn, leads to put a reduction in poverty and crime rates. What is more, it gives them a collective sense of unity, meaning that it can serve as a deterrent for would-be wars and be a reason for global peace. Moreover, globalization can be achieved through this universal language, bolstering the domains of science, healthcare system, as well as art.
To conclude, even though I cite threats to the disappearance of cultural traits along with public rejection as the primary negative sides, I adamantly think that globalization, flourishing commercial practices coupled with a sense of harmony could be seen as positivity.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant. However, there are a few instances where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The use of transition words and phrases helps to guide the reader through the text and connect ideas. However, the coherence could be improved in some areas, such as the discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of the proposed universal language.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
- Make sure that the benefits and drawbacks are presented in a clear and logical order.
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and there is evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity and precision.
The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. There are a few minor errors, but they do not impede communication. The essay demonstrates a good command of complex sentence structures and a variety of grammatical forms. However, there are a few minor errors that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay addresses the task fully and presents a well-developed response. The writer’s position is clear and supported by relevant examples. However, the discussion could be more balanced by providing more specific examples and considering the potential impact on specific cultures or languages.
Suggestions
- Consider providing more specific examples to support your arguments.
- Balance the discussion by considering the potential impact of the new language on specific cultures or languages.