Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree
A group of people think the money spent on innovating technology for space exploration is not justified. I completely agree with this opinion, the reason is that building advanced technology has caused a wide range of problems in the social life and even environment. This essay I will give relevant ideas for this point of view and try to draw some conclusion.
First and foremost, improving technological capabilities is a significant loss of potential resources for life. Because this type of expedition is performed with megabucks, they create financial pressures. Instead of this money should be directed towards education and helping penniless families. Furthermore, technological advancements like manufacturing nuclear weapons caused wars in the world. For instance, it has become apocalypse of urbanization and also it causes environmental problems, such as rising the weather temperature, flooding.
Secondly, though landing on the Moon is considered a significant achievement, it has no brought noticeable improvements to people’s lives. This leads to, the Moon landing has not economically benefited humanity in tangible many ways. Moreover, even though vast amount of money Has been spent for space explorations, there were no worthwhile results up to now. Namely, space missions have failed to address problems related with cosmic garbage. It put world connection system on the line.
In conclusion, I entirely disagree with spending money on space explorations and it cannot be justified. Space research not only influences negatively but also to puts people’s life at risk. Government should focus on funding space programs.
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the connection between ideas less smooth. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reiterating the stance on the issue.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
- Make sure to fully develop your conclusion to effectively summarize the main points and reiterate your stance on the issue.
The essay uses a sufficient range of vocabulary and there is evidence of some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a wide range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. However, these errors do not generally impede communication. The essay uses a variety of complex and simple sentence structures, but there are some grammatical errors and punctuation issues that can hinder understanding. Reviewing and revising for these errors is recommended to improve the overall clarity and professionalism of the essay.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the idea that the money spent on space exploration could be better used in other areas, such as education and supporting underprivileged families. The writer presents a clear stance on the issue and supports it with relevant arguments. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and evidence to support the arguments made.
Suggestions
- Ensure that each argument is fully developed and supported with specific examples.
- Consider addressing potential counterarguments to strengthen the overall position.