Some scientist believe that intelligent life forms may live on other planets. They want to send massage to space and contact these life forms. other scientists think this is dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Scientists have different views as to whether intelligent life may exist on other planets, they want to contact with them in order to learn their life style or it could be life-threatening. Both of them may be true in their own right, but I am of the opinion that, although there are some disadvantages to connecting with extraterrestrial life, the benefits can easily outweigh the risks.
In many parts of the world, there some disadvantages of researching and connecting with other planets life including but not limited to Psychological Impact, Technological Disadvantages and Exposure to Unknown Diseases, on the grounds that, during the period of exploring the position the scientists can experiences tektology issues or hard diseases and the most common impact of learning the life forms is leak of healthcare and psychological problems. Although there are enough information of pros side, the upsides dates are strong rather than people wait.
On the other hand, it is believed by some researchers, the inhabitants life may exist on other planets, and they want to explore those planets life, according to scientists information, many researchers have found the life in the red planet (Jupiter) such as deep sea, clear water and necessary resources by using technology and humans. In addition, In Mars, inhabitants started to building the real life like the new buildings, green spaces which means, scientists not only connected with some extraterrestrial life but also stared to struggling with life there.
In conclusion, those disadvantages may be true in their own right but I strongly believe that the positive sides are more effective then negative.

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure to clearly state your opinion in the conclusion and summarize the main points.

The essay uses a range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of a flexible use of vocabulary. However, there are some inaccuracies and awkward phrases. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with some flexibility and precision in the use of language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choices that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds some variety and interest to the writing. However, there are some grammatical errors and awkward constructions that could be revised for clarity and accuracy.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the potential advantages and disadvantages of researching and connecting with other planets’ life forms. The writer presents a clear position, stating that the benefits outweigh the risks, and provides some supporting arguments. However, the essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and evidence to support these arguments.