Task 2

There is a debate over which people discussing which location is better to living. In my opinion, while living in countryside provides clean air, healthy nutrition, benefits of living in a city are surpassing
Countryside is the location where industry didn’t get. So, the cost of living there is not as expensive and environmentally as living in city. In cities, high demand for apartments and limited space drive prices up, making rent. On the other hand, rural areas offer affordable housing options with more space and privacy.Additionally , daily expenses such as food, utilities, and transportation are generally less costly in the countryside. Locally grown food is often more affordable, and public services like electricity and water tend to cost less. Additionally, the need for expensive public transportation or fuel is reduced due to shorter commutes.
Despite of these benefits there some humans who are thinking differently. Cities are the areas of development. Schools, jobs, medicine all these are located in the city. And variety of jobs give people opportunities to have excellent future.This makes cities ideal for individuals seeking personal growth and career advancement.And cities provide access to advanced healthcare facilities. Urban areas are home to well-equipped hospitals and specialized doctors, ensuring residents receive high-quality medical care promptly, which is often lacking in rural areas.
In conclusion, both sides have their unique advantages. While living in the countryside provides health, ecology and cheap cost living, living in city.Despite the advantages of urban life living in city is definitely good place for development and advancement

6.5

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the progression of ideas a bit difficult to follow. Additionally, there are some issues with coherence, as the connection between ideas can be unclear. More effective use of cohesive devices and a clearer connection between ideas would enhance the overall coherence of the essay.

Suggestions

Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
Make sure that the use of cohesive devices is consistent and appropriate.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource. However, there are some inaccuracies and awkward phrasings that can be improved. The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical resource, with a variety of vocabulary used effectively. However, there are some inaccuracies and awkward phrasings that can be improved. More precise and varied vocabulary, as well as a focus on collocation, would enhance the overall quality of the essay.

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures. However, there are some errors and awkward phrasings that can be improved. The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and a variety of grammatical structures effectively. However, there are some errors and awkward phrasings that can be improved. Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, particularly in the use of articles and prepositions, would enhance the overall quality of the essay.

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. More specific examples and a clearer focus on the implications of the argument would enhance the overall response.