The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people say that young people can also be a leader. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people say that most leaders are senior people because they do a better job than younger individuals and also more experienced in terms of management. While others argue that, younger generations also have better life skills to run in different companies since most of them are familiar with cutting-edge technologies and have a better understanding of the internet. I believe both ages play a vital role if they are given an opportunity.
On the one hand, older people possess long-term working experience; therefore, they can make informed decisions accurately. For example, big companies like Apple and Amazon are run by leaders who are over 60, and the reason is their ability to see everything in advance. What’s more, most of them have at least 10 years of experience, which makes their positions bloom in the long run.
On the flip side, younger people are often productive in time management and comprehending complex tasks related to technologies and the internet, meaning most of them can work with current methods that a particular company requires. For instance, some organizations that senior citizens manage might be outdated, which can slow the process of the company, while younger individuals can easily associate with the advancement of technologies.
In my opinion, both individuals are pretty good in diverse ways, older are experienced in spite of being conservative, while younger leaders can excel in companies by bringing a futuristic approach, though they might be inexperienced, and as a result they may make multiple mistakes which can lead some problems.
In conclusion, leadrship is not about the age but also about the approach that people can step, younger have different attitudes, whereas, older have different

7.0

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.

Suggestions

Use a variety of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
Ensure that your conclusion fully summarizes the main points of your essay.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of more varied and precise vocabulary could help to convey the nuances of the arguments more effectively.

The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar and sentence structure, with only minor errors. However, there are a few instances of awkward phrasing and grammatical errors that could be revised for clarity. Additionally, the use of a wider range of sentence structures could help to make the arguments more nuanced and engaging.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported. The essay addresses the topic by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of both older and younger leaders. The writer presents a balanced view, acknowledging the experience of older leaders and the innovative potential of younger leaders. However, the argument could be more fully developed, with more specific examples and a clearer structure in the body paragraphs. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.