In today’s world, working hours have become a controversial issue, highlighting the suggestion to shrink the workweek so that employees can have an extended weekend accordingly. I am inclined to disagree with this statement since it can contribute to less competitiveness among companies, but also pinpoint how working less does not guarantee happiness.
As we live in a competitive world, where companies constantly strive to outperform each other, the reduction in working hours is likely to disrupt this competition. This applies to CEOs who are responsible for the flourishment of the company. In other words, leaders ought to work harder than anyone in the organization by putting in extra time in order to not be left behind by competitors when it comes to gaining market share and improving their services. However, if the company implements a compressed workweek scheme, it might lead to a reduction in economic output, thus preventing company growth.
On the other hand, employees whose responsibilities are far less than that of CEOs should stick to the same conventional working weeks. Although majorities tend to believe working less is a key determinant of happiness due to reduced stress levels, stress in the workplace is not always paired with changes in happiness levels since fulfillment in life depends on factors such as meaningful relationships and a sense of purpose. Instead, companies should incorporate health programs and create an engaged and productive workforce rather than posing to employees to work less.
In conclusion, implementing shortened working weeks is not always a good option, considering the fact it can lead to worsened function of the company by making it uncompetitive. Additionally, those who believe that working less has to do with happiness should seek fulfillment from community and family engagements, likewise, companies need to take a responsibility to maintain their workers’ mental well-being.