These days people send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone. Do the advantages of texting outweigh its disadvantages?
In recent years, instant messaging has taken precedence over having a phone conversation. Although texting offers flexibility in response time, and written records ,its disadvantages are far more significant, including potential misunderstandings, decreased communication skills along with overuse of abbreviations.
There are a number of benefits associated with the digital communication. One is opportunity for users to make well-thought-out decisions during conversation. Unlike communicating by the phone, people do not need to give instant answers on mobile texting platforms, leaving adequate time for thinking. Taking each person’s communication skills into account, some of them tackle with expressing their feelings on complex matters such as relationship in the given short period. Therefore, digital messaging provides them with an opportunity to illustrate their opinions clearly.
Using written texts as documents in instances of legal offences can be another advantage. When there are certain conflicts, deception, or repression between communicators, recordings of the chat can serve for the sake of a casualty. Millions if not billions of victims of crime who are unable to demand their rights without any written evidens can be a pertinent example for the significant role of messaging.
Despite the advantages of texting, its limitations cannot be overlooked. One major drawback has to do with the risk of misinterpretation. As there is no verbal interaction, delivering ideas as it is thought can be challenging, resulting in confusion and conflicts between users.
Furthermore, the overreliance on texts takes a toll on communication and writing skills. As people turn into messaging, they start neglecting the importance of verbal interaction simultaneously using mostly abbreviations to avoid time-wasting during typing. This shapes unhealthy habits in the long run, damaging interpersonal and literacy skills.
In conclusion, the positive effects of short message service include the convenient mode of communication and written evidence. However. This does not necessarily mean that it can only serve the public interest, because texting can lead to more serious problems such as the deterioration of language proficiency and confusion.
The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas more effectively.
- Make sure that your conclusion fully summarizes the arguments you have made in the essay.
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good command of language with a variety of vocabulary, but there are some instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. For example, “recordings of the chat can serve for the sake of a casualty” should be “recordings of the chat can serve for the sake of a casus,” and “written texts as documents in instances of legal offences” should be “written texts as documents in legal matters.” Improving lexical precision and variety will enhance the clarity and professionalism of the essay. Additionally, ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve overall readability.
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few instances of incorrect or awkward grammar. The essay contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. These include issues with punctuation, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure. For example, “One is opportunity for users to make well-thought-out decisions during conversation” should be “One advantage is the opportunity for users to make well-thought-out decisions during conversations,” and “recordings of the chat can serve for the sake of a casualty” should be “recordings of the chat can serve as evidence in legal cases.” Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, including correct verb forms and preposition usage, will improve the overall quality of the essay.
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of texting. The writer presents a balanced view and provides relevant examples to support their points. However, the essay could benefit from a more focused thesis statement and a clearer structure in the introduction. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points but could be more comprehensive.
Suggestions
- Make sure to fully develop your arguments and support them with specific examples.