Skip to main content

With the rise in popularity of the internet, newspapers will soon become a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In an era characterized by the advent of the internet, it has become increasingly common for traditional newspapers to fall out of favor, particularly in developed nations. While this situation offers clear benefits associated with bridging the information gap, I firmly believe that it does more harm than good when viewed through the lens of cognitive abilities.
Critics of newspapers cite various reasons to support their stance. Thanks to the pervasiveness of the internet, when humans can have access to the latest global news on various digital platforms, such as smartphones, tablets, and laptops, they eradicate geographical barriers to information, which allows individuals in remote areas to stay abreast about current affairs both globally and locally. As a result, they have equivalent access to news as those in urban centers, thereby fostering a more informed and connected society. In a world where people already have access to a plethora of information, using the internet can make a big difference when it comes to receiving news about what is going on across the globe.
Despite these arguments, in my view, newspapers carry greater weight. If individuals regularly engage with newspapers from world-renowned and prestigious publications like The Economist, MIT Technology Review, and National Geographic for in-depth analysis, they gain access to reliable and well-substantiated information, which leads to a better understanding of complex issues and enhances critical thinking. As a consequence of such vital intellectual skills, they broaden their horizons and make informed decisions, thus improving their ability to navigate crucial topics, namely climate change, politics, economics, health, and medicine. At a time when the vast majority of people suffer from major health issues due to sedentary lifestyles, driven by the internet, reading newspapers regularly assumes added significance.
In sum, although use of the internet presents a set of benefits, especially in terms of narrowing the information discrepancy, I remain convinced that it still pales in comparison to the major upsides of newspapers, such as enhancing knowledge and critical thinking. Only by reading newspapers, as opposed to relying solely on gadgets, can people develop the cognitive depth necessary to navigate crucial global issues and make well-informed decisions.

8.0

The essay is logically organized and ideas are connected well. The introduction and conclusion are clear and related to the topic. However, there are a few areas where the flow of ideas could be improved.

Suggestions
  • Try to use a wider range of linking words to connect your ideas.
  • Ensure that your arguments are presented in a clear and logical order.

The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. A wide range of vocabulary is used effectively and accurately. There are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice, but these do not significantly detract from the overall clarity of the essay.

The essay uses a wide range of complex structures. The majority of sentences are error-free, and punctuation is well managed. There are a few minor errors, but these do not significantly detract from the overall clarity of the essay.

The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The arguments are well-developed and supported with relevant examples. The conclusion effectively summarizes the key points and reiterates the writer’s position. However, the introduction could be improved to better engage the reader and provide a clear roadmap for the essay.

Suggestions
  • Consider revising the introduction to provide a clearer roadmap for the essay and to better engage the reader.